TL;DR
Meta and TikTok joined Google at a November 11 parliamentary hearing to object to parts of Indonesia’s proposed copyright law, including provisions affecting news links and AI use. The bill remains under discussion, its current text was not available, and no vote date has been announced.
Meta and TikTok joined Google in opposing parts of Indonesia’s proposed copyright law at a parliamentary hearing in Jakarta on November 11, putting the platforms in a dispute with lawmakers and news publishers over payments for news links and rules for artificial intelligence. The bill is still under deliberation; the current draft was not available for review, and no vote date has been announced.
Get business pricing on tech for your team
- Business-only prices and quantity discounts
- Tax-exempt purchasing
- Multiple users, one account, clear invoices
The proposal revises Indonesia’s Copyright Law, Law No. 28 of 2014. Parliament approved it as an initiative in a plenary session on March 12, 2026, and its Legislation Body, known as Baleg, is now discussing it with the government. According to Kompas, the November 11 hearing included representatives of Google, Meta, TikTok, the Press Council and Satu Lisensi Indonesia.
The provisions described in reports would require platforms to compensate publishers for some uses of news, including aggregation and link previews. The proposal also addresses AI training on copyrighted works, disclosure of AI use, protection for AI-assisted works, and imitation of a creator’s distinctive style. Reuters reported these details from a July draft, which an official said was authentic but not final. The bill’s text has since changed, and the July version should not be treated as the current proposal.
Google’s representative said a payment requirement for displaying links could force the company to stop crawling, indexing and distributing Indonesian news, Reuters reported. At the hearing, Google also objected to a single collective licensing body and mandatory licenses for AI training, and called for safe-harbor protections for platforms. Meta argued that sharing a link is not the same as republishing news and said payment duties could reduce publishers’ traffic and revenue. TikTok said disclosure requirements should not cover cases where AI only assists with content creation and also sought to retain safe-harbor protection.
A Dispute Over News and AI Rights
The proposal could change how platforms use and display Indonesian news, as well as the terms on which copyrighted material may be used in AI training. If adopted, the rules could affect publishers’ potential compensation, platforms’ distribution decisions, and the rights and obligations of creators and AI developers. Those outcomes depend on the final wording and how the provisions are applied.
The disagreement also highlights competing accounts of the current relationship between platforms and publishers. Dewan Pers deputy chair Totok Suryanto told lawmakers that platforms take 80 percent of digital advertising and that traffic from platforms to news sites has fallen by up to 70 percent, according to the source material’s account of the hearing. Those figures were presented by the press council; the available material does not provide the methodology or time period behind them. Meta, meanwhile, said payment duties could cost publishers traffic and revenue.
Google’s warning about stopping news crawling and distribution describes a possible company response, not an announced change. Whether platforms would alter their services if the bill passes, and how that would affect access to journalism, remain open questions.
Products Worth Considering
Apple MacBook Air 13-inch with M5 Chip, 16GB Memory, 512GB SSD, Silver
Logitech MX Mechanical Wireless Illuminated Keyboard, Tactile Quiet, Graphite
Samsung 32-inch Odyssey G5 G51F QHD 180Hz Gaming Monitor
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
From the July Draft to November
Reuters first reported the bill’s AI provisions on July 17, citing a draft. Hermansyah Siregar, a law ministry official overseeing intellectual property, confirmed the draft was authentic and described it as Indonesia’s first explicit recognition of AI in copyright law. He also said it was not final. The July version reportedly proposed disclosure of AI use, limits on protection for fully AI-generated works, and rules treating copyrighted works used to train AI models under fair-use provisions or licensing agreements.
That draft also reportedly proposed compensation for platforms’ aggregation, republication and display of news previews, with payments routed through state-supervised collective management organisations. It included possible sanctions for noncompliance, including revocation of local business permits. Because the text has changed and the current version could not be obtained, those provisions cannot be assumed to appear unchanged in the version before Baleg.
The proposal follows Presidential Regulation No. 32 of 2024, which requires digital platforms to support quality journalism. At the November hearing, Suryanto said the regulation had not worked as intended and that platform compliance was low, according to Aktual. The material supplied does not establish whether the proposed law would replace, supplement or change enforcement of that regulation.
““The development of generative AI has disrupted the copyright framework.””
— Hermansyah Siregar, a law ministry official overseeing intellectual property, speaking to Reuters
The wording now before lawmakers is not confirmed here. The full current text could not be obtained, and reports refer to different versions. Google cited Articles 29 and 30 at the hearing, according to Suara, but those article numbers are provisional because the latest text was unavailable.
It is also unclear how the draft defines sufficient human involvement for an AI-assisted work, what counts as imitation of a creator’s distinctive style, or how any licensing and fair-use provisions would operate. The source material does not establish the final scope of any payment duty, the calculation of compensation, or which collective organisations would administer it.
No vote date was announced in the available reporting. The law’s final provisions, enforcement arrangements and likely effects on publishers, creators, platforms and AI developers remain unsettled while deliberations continue.
Lawmakers Continue Bill Deliberations
Baleg is discussing the copyright revision with the government. The November 11 hearing gave platform representatives, the Press Council and Satu Lisensi Indonesia an opportunity to present their positions. The next material step is the committee’s continued review and any revised text it makes available; the supplied reporting does not state when that may happen.
Readers can watch for an updated draft, further hearings, or an announced vote timetable. Until lawmakers publish or confirm the operative wording, the July provisions and the positions stated by companies and press representatives describe the debate, not settled law.
Key Questions
Has Indonesia passed the proposed copyright law?
No. The proposal is under discussion by parliament’s Legislation Body and the government. The source material reports no vote date.
What did Meta and TikTok object to?
Meta said sharing a news link is not republication and argued that payment duties could reduce publishers’ traffic and revenue. TikTok said AI disclosure should not apply when AI only assists with content and called for platform safe-harbor protection.
What AI rules were reported in the proposal?
A July draft reportedly addressed AI-use disclosure, protection for AI-assisted works, imitation of a creator’s distinctive style, and licensing or fair use for copyrighted works used in AI training. That draft was not final, and the current text was unavailable.
Would platforms have to pay Indonesian news publishers?
The proposal has been reported as including payments for some uses of news, including link previews. The exact duty in the current draft is unclear, and the bill has not been passed.
Source: Thorsten Meyer AI
