🔍 Read the full analysis: A Tale Of Two Tech Giants: Investors Favored Microsoft Over Alphabet on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get business pricing on tech for your team
- Business-only prices and quantity discounts
- Tax-exempt purchasing
- Multiple users, one account, clear invoices
TL;DR
After both companies reported results on Oct. 28, Microsoft shares rose about 4% in after-hours trading and Alphabet’s fell about 10%. Alphabet’s Google Cloud grew faster than Azure, but Alphabet reported negative free cash flow and missed analyst forecasts, while Microsoft beat expectations and remained free-cash-flow positive. Both said demand for computing capacity exceeds supply.
Microsoft shares rose about 4% and Alphabet shares fell about 10% in after-hours trading on Oct. 28, after the two technology companies reported quarterly results. Alphabet’s Google Cloud grew faster than Microsoft’s Azure, but investors also saw a sharp contrast in free cash flow and analyst expectations: Microsoft beat forecasts, while Alphabet reported negative free cash flow and missed forecasts for revenue, earnings per share and search advertising, according to the source report.
Microsoft reported $92.3 billion in revenue, up 19% year over year, and adjusted earnings per share of $4.89, above the $4.73 analysts polled by LSEG had expected, according to CNBC. Azure revenue rose 48% to $33.2 billion, exceeding the 45% growth rate Microsoft had guided to in July. The company disclosed Azure quarterly revenue in dollars for the first time, according to the source material.
Alphabet said Google Cloud revenue rose 103% to $30.7 billion. That faster growth did not prevent a negative market reaction. The source report says Alphabet missed analyst forecasts for revenue, earnings per share and search advertising. It also reported negative $9.1 billion in free cash flow, the second consecutive negative quarter, compared with Microsoft’s $18.6 billion in positive free cash flow.
The companies’ investment plans underline the pressure to build computing capacity. Microsoft’s capital spending was $45.2 billion when finance leases were included, or $39.4 billion in cash paid for property and equipment. Alphabet’s capital spending rose 114% year over year, according to the source report’s calculations from cash-flow statements. Both companies said demand exceeded available supply. Microsoft cited delayed third-party capacity deliveries, while Alphabet had begun renting capacity from other providers.
Infographic 01 · The scorecard
Same night, opposite verdicts.
The four numbers from my 28 October preview, scored with both companies’ own reports for July to September 2026.
The four numbers I said to watch, scored
Status chips: ok = healthy, hold = watch, urgent = warning sign. My assessment.
| Metric | Microsoft | Alphabet |
|---|---|---|
| 1 · Capex guidance | Microsoft hold About $170B for calendar 2026 (July: about $175B), lower only because deliveries slipped. More than $50B next quarter. | Alphabet hold $195–205B for 2026, unchanged. 2027 to “increase significantly”; no number yet. |
| 2 · Cloud growth vs. capex | Microsoft hold Azure +48%. Capex incl. finance leases +30%; cash capex about 2×. | Alphabet hold Google Cloud +103%. Capex +114% to $51.4B. |
| 3 · Free cash flow + funding | Microsoft ok +$18.6B (−27%). No new bonds. $10.2B returned to shareholders. | Alphabet urgent −$9.1B. $28.7B bonds and $12.4B new shares in the quarter. No buybacks. |
| 4 · Capacity | Microsoft hold “Demand continues to exceed available supply.” Delayed GPU capacity moves to the first half of 2027. | Alphabet hold “Supply constrained.” Renting third-party capacity; margin pressure ahead. |
Microsoft
≈ +4%After-hours, 28 Oct (CNBC; Reuters: more than 5%)
- Beat on revenue ($92.3B, +19%) and earnings per share ($4.89 adjusted vs. $4.73 expected)
- Azure guide 49–50% for the current quarter
- Self-funded build-out
Alphabet
≈ −10%After-hours, 28 Oct (CNBC, Reuters)
- Missed on revenue ($127.6B vs. $128.2B expected) and earnings ($2.67 adjusted vs. $3.02)
- Search +12%, below forecasts; AI Mode earns less per query so far
- Build-out now partly financed with bonds and new shares
Sources: Microsoft FY27 Q1 release and call, 28 Oct 2026; Alphabet Q3 2026 release (8-K), 28 Oct 2026; Alphabet Q3 call, third-party transcript; CNBC on Microsoft, 28 Oct; CNBC on Alphabet, 28 Oct; Reuters, 28 Oct. Analyst expectations as reported by CNBC and Reuters (LSEG, StreetAccount). Capex growth for Alphabet and Microsoft’s cash capex: my arithmetic from the cash flow statements. Status chips: Thorsten Meyer.
Powered by Thorsten Meyer AI
Cash Flow Shaped the Market Reaction
The contrasting share moves show that investors were not judging the companies on cloud growth alone. Alphabet’s 103% Google Cloud growth was stronger than Azure’s 48%, but its negative free cash flow and earnings misses raised questions about how the expansion is being funded. The source report says Alphabet raised $28.7 billion in bonds and $12.4 billion by issuing new shares during the quarter, and did not buy back shares.
Microsoft’s positive cash flow gave investors a different picture of its ability to fund infrastructure spending from current operations. That does not mean its investment costs are settled: some expected deliveries were delayed, and the company anticipates spending to rise. The reaction is better read as a difference in perceived financial risk than as a verdict on which company will lead the AI market.
Cloud backlogs also need careful interpretation. Microsoft reported $677 billion in commercial remaining performance obligations, while Google Cloud’s commitments were reported at $561 billion. These are contracted amounts not yet recognized as revenue, not cash already received. The source says only about 30% of Microsoft’s figure is expected to become revenue within 12 months; the two companies’ backlogs do not by themselves settle how quickly spending will produce returns.
Products Worth Considering
Bose S1 Pro+ Portable PA Speaker
LG UltraGear 27-Inch QHD OLED Gaming Monitor, 240Hz, 0.03ms, G-SYNC Compatible, FreeSync Premium Pro, HDMI 2.1
Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (12th Generation, 2024), 16 GB, 7-inch Display, Jade
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
A Quarter of Heavy AI Investment
The results arrived as both companies spend heavily on data centers, chips and related infrastructure to meet demand for cloud and AI services. The source report lists Microsoft’s 2026 capital spending plan at about $170 billion, down from an earlier estimate of about $175 billion, and Alphabet’s at $195 billion to $205 billion, unchanged from its prior outlook. Both point to a further increase in spending in 2027.
Microsoft’s quarter was the first of its fiscal 2027, which began in July. Its reported capital spending varies according to whether finance leases are counted: the $45.2 billion figure includes them, while $39.4 billion is cash paid for property and equipment. The distinction matters when comparing investment with cash flow. Microsoft’s lower-than-expected cash spending partly reflected delayed deliveries, not necessarily a decision to abandon planned capacity.
The companies also described supply constraints. Microsoft Chief Financial Officer Amy Hood said some third-party capacity deliveries expected in the quarter were delayed. The source report says Microsoft expects capital spending above $50 billion in the current quarter and an acceleration in the first half of 2027. Alphabet, meanwhile, was renting capacity from third parties. Those details indicate that demand and the ability to bring new capacity online remain separate issues.
Returns and Capacity Timing Remain Unclear
The reported figures do not show when the companies’ infrastructure spending will translate into sustained profits. Backlogs are commitments, not cash collected, and the source report does not provide a comparable schedule showing when each company expects its cloud commitments to be recognized as revenue. It also remains unclear how long supply constraints will last or how much rented capacity Alphabet will need.
Microsoft’s current cash-flow advantage could narrow as delayed equipment arrives and spending rises. Hood’s guidance points to higher near-term investment, but the precise pace and eventual returns remain uncertain. For Alphabet, the quarter’s negative free cash flow and outside financing are confirmed in the source account; whether that pattern continues in coming quarters is not established by these results alone.
The after-hours price moves are an immediate investor response, not proof of long-term performance. The source material does not give a later closing price or subsequent trading data, and the market reaction could change as investors receive more information.
Investors Will Watch Spending and Delivery
Upcoming results and company updates will show whether Microsoft’s delayed capacity arrives on schedule and whether its planned spending rises as Hood indicated. Investors are likely to track cash capital spending, free cash flow and Azure growth together, rather than treating any one measure as a full account of the investment’s return.
For Alphabet, the next reports will help establish whether Google Cloud can sustain its growth while the company funds its infrastructure build-out. Its cash flow, borrowing and share issuance will be relevant alongside cloud revenue and search advertising performance. Both companies’ ability to add capacity—and the pace at which customers’ commitments become recognized revenue—remains central to judging the durability of this AI investment cycle.
Key Questions
Why did Microsoft shares rise while Alphabet shares fell?
According to the source report, Microsoft beat analyst forecasts and generated $18.6 billion in free cash flow. Alphabet missed forecasts for revenue, earnings per share and search advertising, and reported negative $9.1 billion in free cash flow. Those differences coincided with opposite after-hours moves, though they do not establish how the shares will perform later.
Did Google Cloud grow faster than Azure?
Yes. Alphabet reported Google Cloud revenue growth of 103% to $30.7 billion, while Microsoft reported Azure growth of 48% to $33.2 billion. Faster growth did not prevent Alphabet’s shares from falling after the results.
How much are the companies spending on infrastructure?
The source report lists Microsoft’s 2026 capital spending plan at about $170 billion and Alphabet’s at $195 billion to $205 billion. Microsoft’s quarterly spending was $45.2 billion including finance leases, or $39.4 billion in cash paid for property and equipment.
What do the cloud backlogs mean?
The reported figures are contracted revenue not yet recognized: $677 billion for Microsoft and $561 billion for Google Cloud, according to the source report. They are not cash already collected, and they do not show on their own when the commitments will become revenue.
Are cloud customers getting all the computing capacity they want?
No. Both companies said demand exceeded available supply. Microsoft cited delayed deliveries of third-party capacity, while Alphabet had begun renting capacity from other providers. The duration of the constraints remains unclear.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
